Project Charters and Initiation Documents

A project charter is a foundational document that formally authorizes a project, defines its scope, states its objectives, identifies key stakeholders, and establishes governance arrangements. From an editorial standpoint, project charters are valuable because they document what was intended at the outset — the problem to be solved, the resources allocated, the timeline set, and the governance structure in place. Comparing charters with subsequent implementation records is a primary analytical technique in project case review.

A boardroom conference table — the setting for project governance review and approval
A boardroom conference table — the governance setting in which project charters and major project decisions are reviewed and formally approved.

Status Reports and Progress Records

Project status reports provide a periodic snapshot of project health — typically covering schedule, budget, scope, and risk. They are prospective in that they look forward to what remains to be done, and retrospective in that they account for work completed in the period. A series of status reports across a project's lifecycle provides a documentary timeline that is particularly useful for understanding where projects encountered difficulty and how that difficulty was communicated to governance bodies.

Post-Project Reviews and Post-Mortems

A post-project review — sometimes called a post-mortem, lessons-learned document, or after-action review — is produced at the conclusion of a project to capture what was learned: what went well, what did not, and what should be done differently in future. These documents are among the most analytically candid in the project management documentary record, though their candor varies. Organizations that conduct formal, structured post-project reviews and make them available provide a richer evidential base for case analysis than those that do not.

What this article does not cover

  • Specific project management methodologies or frameworks in technical detail
  • Recommendations for how organizations should structure their project documentation
  • Assessment of any specific organization's project management quality
  • Financial, investment, or legal advice of any kind